A place for talking about the Ethereum Virtual Machine on Farcaster.

Doesn’t the fact that a smart contract wallet is transferable break the idea of a soul bound token?

SBTs are non-transferable, but if a contract wallet owns an SBT the wallet can be transferred to someone else.

Working on building zkTLS infra/products. A ruthless empiricist and meme connoisseur.

/opacity
/eulerlagrange

Is it any less of a violation of SBTs if I give someone else my seed phrase or private key?

* sponsored by Supercast, 25,000 $ANON at a time
* higher rank in Tae Kwon Do than Vladimir Putin
* hobbies include finding new lows of dad jokes

yes, because giving somebody your private keys is not a credible transfer of ownership, since you still have the keys

building /hatsprotocol | 
proudly mid-curving it since 1995

That's a fair distinction, though, functionally, if I give someone my seed phrase, my Swiss cheese memory is not going to be able to recall it. That's effectively a permanent transfer.

Hahaha probably the same for my memory, but the point is that the buyer’s perception is what matters, and good luck convincing a potential wallet buyer that you didn’t write down your seed phrase

Deplorable! What ever happened to trust in the cryptocurrency community?