Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Spencer Perkins pfp
Spencer Perkins
@spencerperkins.eth
If the DAO didn't want "Escrowed Streaming", why was it voted through as part of DUNA? Seems like just threw away $82k + months of Verbs time spent on this?
5 replies
4 recasts
19 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
I don't think anyone wanted this from the beginning but the reality is that DUNA prop was literally never going to fail, it could have had millions worth of spend and the big dawgs were still going to vote it through
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Sam pfp
Sam
@sams
I think it was a matter of attention. Most of the focus was on the broader DUNA topic which overshadowed the escrowed streaming part and didn’t allow us to have a really deep conversation on it like we can with its own prop.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

mike good ⌐◨-◨ pfp
mike good ⌐◨-◨
@mikegood
Can vote to support something but disagree with the design, or nah?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Ben pfp
Ben
@jarmen
Verbs were hitting the mark when the use snapshot votes as direct community engagement to allocate time to an upgrade or design. This seems like a closed conversation and the community just voted.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

醓 pfp
@pip
Up only
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction