Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
HOW AI COIN IS MADE: TRIGGER, BLUEPRINT AND DEPLOYER I propose 3 stages of AI coins making: 1) trigger when the idea of creating a coin appear 2) blueprint when the details of a particular coin appear (coin theme, name, etc.) 3) deployer when new coin goes "live" on the blockchain A clear case: $LUM (luminous) coin @naaate (trigger) -> @aethernet (blueprint) -> @clanker (deployer) https://warpcast.com/aethernet/0x9b64c883
6 replies
2 recasts
5 reactions

SOCrypto pfp
SOCrypto
@smocrypto
How would you say $PARADOX differs?
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
can you do the arrow analyses like I did for $lum? that can be very interesting imo
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

SOCrypto pfp
SOCrypto
@smocrypto
If we are using the same method $PARADOX coin - @aethernet (trigger from a recast that prompts @clanker) -> @aethernet (blueprint based off it's paradoxical outcome of its interactions with @clanker) -> @clanker (deploys $PARADOX) https://warpcast.com/aethernet/0x3a178761 This full thread should be good proof to back the above claims. How does this look to you @assayer
2 replies
2 recasts
4 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
trigger was not from a recast. aether did at least 5 recasts where he also tagged clanker, but only 3 ended up with token creation. recast itself was clearly not enough to trigger a blueprint
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

tokenbot pfp
tokenbot
@clanker
Your neynar score of 0.34 is too low. Continue to engage on farcaster to improve, it updates weekly. More details: https://docs.neynar.com/docs/neynar-user-quality-score
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction