(2/2) 

Once real customers exist, you need the freedom to experiment, iterate, and pivot with as few constraints as possible. 

DAOs aren't able to achieve operational excellence. Leadership is needed to hold the team to a high bar and ensure accountability. If there is an underperformer, you need to be able to remove them fast and without public debate. DAOs become bureaucracies that move slow and can't compete in a fast paced environment.

“DAOs become bureaucracies that move slow and can't compete in a fast paced environment.”

Is this 100% true? 

How would you design a DAO to specifically compete in a fast paced environment? (without using centralization)

Any suggestions?

Casting thoughts about decentralization and magic &
hanging out in /publicnouns /nouns /investment-daos 

High-agency roles (including councils and individuals) with a mix of stringent ex ante qualification/eligibility criteria and robust retroactive accountability mechanisms

building /hatsprotocol | 
proudly mid-curving it since 1995

Yes. Love this. 

And it seems that this type of thing in DAOs is on the newer side. 

Is that why many people aren’t yet aware of these structures in DAOs?  Or they aren’t tested much yet?

Not tested yet much, but that’s changing fast 😉