That being said it’s clearly redacted to not list Virtuals at this point which imo suggests there might be an actual reason why (ie something regulatory re fee structure)

They HAVE listed aixbt perps so that suggests to me spot is on the way for that

Seems lack of virtual listing is a regulatory thing

The @coinbase listings team wants to list any and every token that lifts up builders, no matter what chain it's on.  But as a regulated exchange there are important differences between what we want to list, and what we are able to list. I know that's not always clear, and…

I've spent the last few months in deep conversation with the @coinbase listings team on how they can better support and lift up builders, whether it's on @base or any other chain (L1, L2, everywhere)

There's a difference between what Coinbase wants to list, and what they're able…

jesse.base.eth

Seems lack of virtual listing is a regulatory thing

https://x.com/jessepollak/status/1884054409291927685?s=46

icebreaker.xyz/0xen |
https://gallery.so/Oxen/galleries | https://opensea.io/collection/farcats

token launcher as product may not have regulatory clarity 

also recent buyback/burn mechanism from virtual fees

my best guess

Are centralized exchanges really gonna be key distribution forever? If so, we failed as an industry 🫡