six
@six
This feels like an underdiscussed “existential” risk of onchain social/perhaps public blockchains in general. The more data and history tied to your onchain identity, the more valuable it is for composability - but also the more public it is, which people just are not used to wrt their finances and also has its own downsides ofc.
3 replies
0 recast
22 reactions
six
@six
Obviously the solve is like, don’t do materially stuff on public wallets. But nobody uses that qualifier when talking about how great “onchain” is
3 replies
0 recast
13 reactions
six
@six
materially significant*
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tiny
@tinyrainboot
it's also really easy to make mistakes with this that you can't take back
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
Right but to your point, onchain apps also reward us in all kinds of ways for doing the maximum number of things on our main public wallets, so the trade-off is real.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction