jihad ↑ pfp
jihad ↑
@jihad
There are countless tokens that are undervalued relative to their revenue/profit. Most of the market just doesn't know enough about them, so even if they're "undervalued," there's no indication that new money will catch up to the same thesis. This is significantly less true for stocks of public companies. Why?
6 replies
1 recast
11 reactions

six pfp
six
@six
I think it’s because the revenue doesn’t actively accrue to token value If there were rev share or buybacks or something they’d get valued closer to traditional companies
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

six pfp
six
@six
Uniswap is a canonical example here as value goes to Labs equity and the token is just a gov token until there’s a fee switch
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

streetphotography.eth pfp
streetphotography.eth
@streetphoto
Indeed - P/E, dividends, etc are not a thing There are many more people hunting for those value stocks, too. With much more money to invest. We are a bubble. Floating in a fantasy. How is it that $ABYSS hit 1.5m mcap top but $JAILSTOOL hit 200-300m mcap? Nothing matters and nothing makes sense.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨
@joshuafisher.eth
Right, Apple stock is valuable, Apple fan tokens, not so much
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

↑Dom pfp
↑Dom
@onchaindom.eth
Not every company does dividends or buybacks tho. And many trade at valuations that don’t match anyway. Any token could do buybacks from their treasury, but you also could look at it like ppl who continue to buy the dips are doing “community buybacks”. If enough hardcore community members have revenue streams that they continue to buy the token with, you have revenue accruing to the token, just in a more subtle way than the company saying “we’re doing buybacks”.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction