six
@six
If you believe the $5 prevents people from signing up, this thesis is easily testable —> spend 500 warps to invite someone for free and see if they retain
0 reply
2 recasts
12 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
this thinking is a bit narrow imo the $5 fee imposes a constraint on all apps building on farcaster now on top of trying to get someone to try your farcaster-based app in the first place they need to pay $5. it compounds the difficulty of getting users inb4 read-only and onboard them to farcaster later. yeah yeah
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
J Finn 🎩
@jdotfinn
Buying Warps in and of itself is a process, and you can’t swap into them from any other token on here.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
downshift
@downshift.eth
🤌
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
:)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
comm intern
@comm.eth
invest $5, post well, get 5USDC back easy money
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dr B lizardo
@bluelizardo.eth
waprs are free tho ? :))
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Juli 🎩↑
@juli
I spent it on some friends. They don’t post but some do occasionally check in and all of them are ready to join a fun channel that I’d launch. Would better content make them check in more often? Sure. Is this most important for growth? No. “why am I getting invited every week to a new WhatsApp/telegram group with friends and friends of friends but not on Warpcast and I - as poweruser - don’t even consider doing a group for my [birthday, football group] here?” Feels like 1 of many easy layups (that would have huge network effects) that is impossible with the current setup. Each real person that downloaded the app and signed up is 100x more likely to check in, use a specific farcaster channel/app or contribute content than a person that doesn’t even have an account. (No need to be active right away)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
