Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

TaylorWebb.eth ā“‚ļøšŸ’œ pfp
TaylorWebb.eth ā“‚ļøšŸ’œ
@taylorwebb.eth
I'm incredibly bullish on the changes coming to channels. Requiring ownership of the channel FT to cast there gives the FTs huge utility (for channels that opt in to the FT membership model). I think this will make the communities around channels MUCH stronger and more aligned (even DAOish?), rather than now where channels are more like hashtags
46 replies
9 recasts
72 reactions

Emily šŸŽ©šŸƒšŸ– pfp
Emily šŸŽ©šŸƒšŸ–
@mahla
But Iā€™m not bullish about new changes:(
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

TaylorWebb.eth ā“‚ļøšŸ’œ pfp
TaylorWebb.eth ā“‚ļøšŸ’œ
@taylorwebb.eth
why not?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Emily šŸŽ©šŸƒšŸ– pfp
Emily šŸŽ©šŸƒšŸ–
@mahla
This is not good for the big channel, and we can never see a channel with millions of members in the future
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

TaylorWebb.eth ā“‚ļøšŸ’œ pfp
TaylorWebb.eth ā“‚ļøšŸ’œ
@taylorwebb.eth
well the good thing is that channels could make the entry cost really low, like a few dollars worth of Moxie to become a member. Or channel owners could decide to not token gate it, and let everyone in.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Felicia Hasibuan šŸŽ­ pfp
Felicia Hasibuan šŸŽ­
@silentkiller99
Good thinking I'm waiting for that Taylor šŸ«¶
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction