Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
I actually think the growth of app layer is exactly the time that good social philosophy is needed *most*. Analogy: imagine that C++ had been made by a totalitarian racist fascist. Would it be a worse language? Probably not. C++ is general purpose, there isn't much surface for bad social philosophy to wreck it (or good social philosophy to improve it). Ethereum L1 is not quite in that position: someone who doesn't believe in decentralization would not add light clients, or FOCIL, or (good forms of) account abstraction; someone who doesn't mind energy waste would not spend half a decade moving to PoS... But the EVM opcodes might have been roughly the same either way. So Ethereum is perhaps 50% general-purpose. Apps are ~80% special purpose. What apps you build depends heavily on what ideas you have of what ethereum apps (and ethereum as a whole) are there to do for the world. And so having good ideas on this topic out there becomes crucially important. https://x.com/owocki/status/1911160442728419681
17 replies
71 recasts
331 reactions
Peter🎩
@silencedogood.eth
The 'invisible hand' eschews judgements such as a "good social framework", and the "good intentions" or lack thereof of developers in a given app (or political system etc.) in the long-run likely has little bearing on the outcome (bubbles, fraud etc. short-term harmful, but in the long-run may help fortify systems)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction