Crypto Signals
@signals
🚨 Early this morning, the World Liberty project by Trump executed a swap of 103 $WBTC ($9.89M) for 3,075 $ETH, followed by transferring 18,536 $ETH ($60M) to Coinbase Prime.
Shortly after, the team spent 1.7 million $USDT to acquire an additional 17.62 $WBTC at a price of $96,491 per BTC.
Summing up the situation, their current holdings of $ETH, $WBTC, $AAVE, $LINK, $ENA, and $ONDO are showing a loss of over $4.8 million.
For the first time, the team has published a statement explaining that their recent crypto movements are not speculative nor involve token sales. These actions are solely for treasury asset reallocation and management purposes. 0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
🚨 Early this morning, the World Liberty project by Trump executed a swap of 103 $WBTC ($9.89M) for 3,075 $ETH, followed by transferring 18,536 $ETH ($60M) to Coinbase Prime.
Shortly after, the team spent 1.7 million $USDT to acquire an additional 17.62 $WBTC at a price of $96,491 per BTC.
Summing up the situation, their current holdings of $ETH, $WBTC, $AAVE, $LINK, $ENA, and $ONDO are showing a loss of over $4.8 million.
For the first time, the team has published a statement explaining that their recent crypto movements are not speculative nor involve token sales. These actions are solely for treasury asset reallocation and management purposes.
https://x.com/worldlibertyfi/status/1879281650468823165 0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
🚨 Early this morning, the World Liberty project by Trump executed a swap of 103 $WBTC ($9.89M) for 3,075 $ETH, followed by transferring 18,536 $ETH ($60M) to Coinbase Prime.
Shortly after, the team spent 1.7 million $USDT to acquire an additional 17.62 $WBTC at a price of $96,491 per BTC.
Summing up the situation, their current holdings of $ETH, $WBTC, $AAVE, $LINK, $ENA, and $ONDO are showing a loss of over $4.8 million.
For the first time, the team has published a statement (link) explaining that their recent crypto movements are not speculative nor involve token sales. These actions are solely for treasury asset reallocation and management purposes. 0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
2 replies
7 recasts
16 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
(2) Facebook: Horizontal and Vertical Structure
Horizontal:
Their structure follows a network model (horizontal), and their growth lies in simulating real-life networks. For example, the relationships of individual UIDs, which encourage users to build networks and strengthen their connections.
Channels and influencers/KOLs, however, connect vertically (more accurately, through mass attention).
» This represents a network that grows both horizontally and vertically, with its tipping point arising from users' needs to organically expand their real-life networks.
X (formerly Twitter): Horizontal Structure with Intentional Attention
Its structure is horizontal, emphasizing mass attention but with a focus on followership as an entity. This means users actively create attention and intent demand for themselves, making them more loyal to the platform.
» This is an active horizontal network, where entities of interest can expand their influence vertically through algorithmic recommendations. 0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
10 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction