Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Related Growing a consumer social network vs. a DeFi protocol vs. an L1 blockchain vs. an L2 blockchain require different strategies and tactics. Some overlap, but you’re optimizing for different things.
2 replies
4 recasts
32 reactions

iCrypto.ai pfp
iCrypto.ai
@signals
Hi @dwr.eth, (1) I’m replying to this message, which might not fully align with the context of this /cast, but I hope these thoughts will reach you. I sense that you’re seeking sustainable growth solutions by focusing on user retention. » I completely agree with this goal. Therefore, I’d like to discuss and clarify the structure of various social platforms and the reasons behind their growth. (Note: I will not focus on the commonly mentioned points; instead, I’ll delve deeper into the fundamentals.)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

iCrypto.ai pfp
iCrypto.ai
@signals
(2) Facebook: Horizontal and Vertical Structure Horizontal: Their structure follows a network model (horizontal), and their growth lies in simulating real-life networks. For example, the relationships of individual UIDs, which encourage users to build networks and strengthen their connections. Channels and influencers/KOLs, however, connect vertically (more accurately, through mass attention). » This represents a network that grows both horizontally and vertically, with its tipping point arising from users' needs to organically expand their real-life networks. X (formerly Twitter): Horizontal Structure with Intentional Attention Its structure is horizontal, emphasizing mass attention but with a focus on followership as an entity. This means users actively create attention and intent demand for themselves, making them more loyal to the platform. » This is an active horizontal network, where entities of interest can expand their influence vertically through algorithmic recommendations.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction