Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RJ (replyor)  pfp
RJ (replyor)
@shulzzz
okeee, i did a thing. i staked. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ i'm not happy about it, but i'm at peace with it. or so i tell myself today. i staked what i earned last season. that degen came from the degen fam, and it somehow felt right to put it back into the community even if i disagree with the current state of things. i've been impressed with the way jacek and the degen team have been open to suggestions on how to improve the system, so hopefully they iterate quickly as usual. most importantly, they must find a way to address the number-go-down issue. the tipping game is a GAME and when people play games they like to go up the leaderboard, not stake a bunch of money and see their allowance go down every day. and that's the only direction it can go for 90 days! you don't need to have a masters in psychology to know that it is demoralizing to watch your allowance go down literally every day. but what to do?!? continued...
18 replies
2 recasts
21 reactions

RJ (replyor)  pfp
RJ (replyor)
@shulzzz
-re-prioritize openrank. either with additional points in the bonus pool or by reducing the impact of the staked amount. personally, i like a 50/50 split. i can somewhat understand the need to prioritize staking, but not the need to abandon openrank and engagement as a factor. quality engagement is too critical. -guarantee an allowance at the time of staking. you stake an amount, this is your allowance for the 90 day lock period. maybe this isn't viable and there needs to be a floor instead? for example, when you stake, the allowance is 2K. the floor says it won't go below 1.5K this lock period. -scale up the allowance pool and max allowance as the locked amount grows. the distribution pool shouldn't be finite. -cap the % that any one staker can impact the pool. this is supposed to be fun, no reason to let bad actors and selfish degens reduce the already small/shrinking allowance pool. -redistribute openrank bonuses of non-stakers so its not wasted ty ๐Ÿ™
7 replies
0 recast
14 reactions

dd8๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŽญ pfp
dd8๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŽญ
@dd8
I agree with all comments. Increase the pool seems to be absolutely necessary. Both staking and open rank.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Roche๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ–๐ŸŒŠ pfp
Roche๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ–๐ŸŒŠ
@romanchez
I just read this, and yes, that's right. I completely agree with you, Open Rank must definitely be considered. It involves a lot more people. And more people will be interested in creating good content and communication.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Srivatsan sankaran  pfp
Srivatsan sankaran
@srimoam
Well said RJ!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

chii-ka! pfp
chii-ka!
@chii-ka
I agree with RJ. Only when the open rank and 5:5 ratio are achieved will the results be achieved, Now I just put in the money and use the tip. There are many people who don't use the application. 50 $degen
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Marcela pfp
Marcela
@laursa.eth
youโ€™ve got a good point here iโ€™m considering my options but will keep what you said in mind. but i repeat, if they considered open rank id lock right away
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

sparkz  pfp
sparkz
@jacy
i can get behind this. reasonable takes RJ.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sina pfp
Sina
@sinadnl
I agree. Well written my guy๐ŸคŒ๐Ÿป
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

joshisdead.eth pfp
joshisdead.eth
@joshisdead.eth
I haven't staked anything yet but I'm happy you did ๐Ÿซก 181 $farther
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Duraa pfp
Duraa
@duraa.eth
love seeing this.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

dibo pfp
dibo
@dibo
I hope this cast reaches jacek... Really good cast!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Milesx.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฏ pfp
Milesx.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฏ
@milesx.eth
I'm skeptical tho i staked also. It just seems pointless at this point.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

arfonzo pfp
arfonzo
@arfonzo
I think so long as you're at peace with your decision, it's a great thing to do! It sounds like you've thought it through, considered it, and balanced between what you may need and what is reasonable to lock up. Some have mistaken my casts today for "FUD", which is kinda ridiculous. I only want peeps to think carefully about their individual circumstances before locking something up for 3 months for decreasing allowance--after all, it makes no difference to me what you or anyone else does. In the heat of FOMO it can be easy to overallocate locked assets. I've been there before and regretted it. Glad you've made a decision on it! I agree with your second cast too, some of these issues I'd hope to see addressed before I commit more into the locked vault. ๐Ÿ™
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

moonbag.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ’… pfp
moonbag.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ’…
@muffinlovr
Thatโ€™s fair - but also i think itโ€™s reasonable to have a staking requirement i feel. Most large accounts that stood to have their degen allos reduced have been the ones benefiting the most to date from the degen ecosystem so if they are unwilling to reinvest at least some of that they have gained from it then do they really deserve that allo? More than someone willing to put their money where their mouth is? These accounts probably gained a lot of their status from having that degen to tip. Hearing them complain about it to me doesnt make sense. The number go down only is an issue tho for sure.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Camila ๐Ÿซ‚ pfp
Camila ๐Ÿซ‚
@camilags
I locked 10k yesterday and still donโ€™t have an allowance. But I think it is going to be ridiculous low. I totally agree that open rank should play an important role.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ilannnnnnnnkatin pfp
ilannnnnnnnkatin
@ilannnnnnnnkatin
wishing they would just dispense with the whole ranking system . to me it just re-enforces old ideas of hierarchical structures that we desperately need to get unstuck from . given the sandbox like system we have here now excited about other tokens possibly taking up ideas that degen may not .
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

earthcone pfp
earthcone
@earthcone
agree! 50 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction