Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩 pfp
Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩
@rjs
AFAICT, @openrank doesn't treat root casts & replies differently. They use the Farcaster replicator (obsoleted 5 hours ago). Here's the query they use to compute local trust values: no distinction between root vs child casts https://github.com/Karma3Labs/farcaster-graph/blob/main/pipeline/globaltrust/queries.py#L7-L8
0 reply
3 recasts
30 reactions

RJ (replyor)  pfp
RJ (replyor)
@shulzzz
this makes sense. i earned my badge and rank one reply at a time. it's just more difficult when you're getting 1 or 2 reactions instead of 40-100+ unfortunately this means a new game to be played for the farmers. =/ please like, reply and recast this for maximum social capital value. bonus if you get 40 friends too.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩 pfp
Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩
@rjs
Agreed, it should probably take MAX(all possible engagement values for a given cast), not SUM()
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

RJ (replyor)  pfp
RJ (replyor)
@shulzzz
not following. example?? 🙏 100 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩 pfp
Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩
@rjs
Oh I meant to discourage the like and reply and recast crap, OpenRank could just take ONE of those for scoring purposes not ALL of them. Still there are other hidden Algos like PB that will encourage people to do it all, given the lack of transparency.
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction