BuilderDAO

Builder

DAOs on L1 now, what is your sentiment on moving to L2? 

what might hold your DAO back from migrating?

Hold backs are uncertainty about longevity of the L2 and user experience of getting tokens and bridging etc. Unclear technical guidance on how to actually "move" to an L2. As I understand it, tokens could be lost if the bridge process fails or goes away.

building /gmfarcaster network |
blockchain ENT prof |  ⌐◧-◧ Nouncillor, Nouner, BuilderDAO community resident /builder |

https://www.gmfarcaster.com/

Even then: now you have OG L1 tokens and L2, so what do you do about that? Let people redeem/burn to bridge? Then you risk fragmenting your users. Didn't y00ts do this recently? What % ended up bridging over?

Shiny Club is your forever pfp. Ownable, customizable identity for the web3 age. On-chain and CC0 art. Always minting at ✨https://shiny.club✨

with other nft projects there is less incentive to bridge. for nouns daos you have no voting power unless you bridge since the treasury / governance migrates to L2

https://material.work


prev: https://persistence.wtf / https://nouns.build

This sounds good if it works. Since props/voting are typically timed and shorter lived it seems more useful than fully moving everything. 

Would need dual ownership or something to protect against L2 exploits or outages/failures.

the fragmentation point is a very good callout. 

something @neokry and i have been thinking about is keeping auctions on L1, but governance (props and votes) on L2 and transmit messages between L2 <-> L1 via smth like LayerZero