Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
would the devs plz do something? 💜💜💜 https://warpcast.com/kenny/0x2c86fdc6/quotes
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
We do algorithmic reply bumping. Strict rule based performs worse across every retention metric.
1 reply
2 recasts
3 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
Any intuition you can share about the current reply bumping approach? Also were you able to check out this commissioned piece? Any feedback on the analysis? https://paragraph.xyz/@yesyes/checking-the-comment-velocity-of-real-users
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Algo is machine learning. It chooses what you’re likely to engage with. Assumption in 1st paragraph in article is incorrect. We changed it because reverse chronological reply bumping feeds are way worse for retention. Can read the rest later.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
Very curious to hear your thoughts when you have the time. Will help inform future analysis. Thank you!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Analysis is limited <100K FID Plenty of good users >100K FIDs Any analysis focused on OGs is not one focused on what makes sense for new users. We need to grow and retain new users.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions