Are there are governance/legal systems who systematically keep track of the costs/externalities of their rulesets and default to removing/changing rules if they are proven to be a net negative? 

Not “we realized that this is bad and campaign to change it”, but built in proactively.

I wish all governance and policy making was impact focused rather than solution focused.

Step 1 should be to get everyone to agree what we're trying to achieve and how we're going to measure outcome. We can even have automatic revocation of policy if outcome data doesn't support the goal after some period.

(summer of) protocol {support | guild | fellowship} ☀️


Had the same thought in this thread: https://warpcast.com/shazow.eth/0x3811851e