Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jack.top
@jacktop
If Eth user experience gets solved by abstracting away which chain you're using, doesn't that essentially make using ethereum trust based, because you won't know if the L2 ur using actually secures itself with ethereum in a decentralized way? Struggling to see how eth scales without losing it's trustlessness somewhat
4 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
The way I imagine it is you set strong constraints on the chain you care about, this produces cross chain intents that ultimately must be satisfied on the origin chain to be completed successfully. I dont think all chains become fully fungible, chosen source of truth is still a thing.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jack.top
@jacktop
Who decides the constraints though? The individual app makers I guess? Which makes it easy for end users but I guess their assumption will be what they're using is secure by default. But in reality it could be the same as using a centralized exchange depending on which chains the apps are routing through etc.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
IMO wallet decides the constraints, ideally works with the user to construct them appropriately and safely. Frontend works with the wallet to give the necessary pieces.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
ENS is a great example regarding source of truth: Ultimately mainnet controls the domain, but it can delegate to other sources via CCIP. Conversely, we can look up offchain metadata (eg Optimism address) on ENS but again controlled at the source of truth.
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
