The reason to be skeptical about all policy solutions and to think that there's just a deeper problem is that you look at all America's problems today, crime, drugs, the border, problems in education and probably all problems and they're not hard problems. They all have very rational explanations, and very rational solutions and you would still probably have 40% of the country and more than half of the elected people wanting to do nothing about it.

Like there's literally no argument for having homeless drug addicts in the street. Litterly, zero.

They're drug addicts, in the streets, they're breaking any common sense law. Litterly, very dangerous people that could do anything without knowing it and they're ruining all American cities. 

Freedom is not meant to not allow families to walk down the street peacefully and allow drug addicts to ruin cities. This is definitely not what freedom is meant to enable:

Building https://srcbook.com // creator of the https://blockchainsmokers.xyz

I get what you're saying. Though the people who are making the argument for these policies aren't guided by freedom, they're the same people who want to censor speech. It's also the point of the original post, all of these problems/solutions/limits were common sense not that long ago.

Sure it’s a big problem and needs fixing, I was only answering your question as to why there is arguments.

If you decide that you should make decisions for others, where are the limits? CCP does this. No homeless. Want communism?

I’m being facetious on purpose to make a point…. We gotta fix the homeless insanity but we also have to figure out how to do it while living by americas values. Not as easy as it seems at first glance