shanik

@shanik

57 Following

15 Followers

shanik pfp

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

shanik pfp

How do u measure retention?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

יש פה כבר קאסטים בעברית?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

Only semi good Web2.0 equivalents. Closest I can think of: Browser extensions can enrich the experience by infusing it w external logic\value. The "protocol" is the browser, and extension are dApps. I'm looking for the "browser" equivalent of a protocol like FC. There are whole new design patterns to invent here :)

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

I'm looking for UX\product of the FC protocol. The gap is that I don't see it. What would I expect? An "Apps" button that allows me to see the different apps, so I can seamlessly enjoy their value on my FC feed (i.e, on the interactions I create with ppl on the protocol). nm. I'll write something more structured.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

A different sentiment than "pleasant" is the joy and exhilaration from taming nature. For me, the "pooping in nature" experience becomes interesting in one of two scenarios: 1) I'm bringing order to chaos 2) It's part of something internal - telling myself that it's possible There are some web3.0 metaphors here...

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

farcaster://casts/0x6f729b7a1c18d465e9ebf66fd8eab69e2ed2c16dc1616f43e4341b1c78a3cf19/0x6f729b7a1c18d465e9ebf66fd8eab69e2ed2c16dc1616f43e4341b1c78a3cf19 @perl who are u calling null? 🤔

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

@perl Using Web3.0 to leverage the quality of interaction between ppl in communities at scale

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

One can only hope...

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

Makes sense. The "wild" becomes attractive, pleasant & romantic only after we tame, control and "de-wild" it. People that really live close to nature won't associate with it the pleasantness we do. Majestic - yes, awful (as in - inspiring awe) - yes. But "pleasant" isn't a good word here.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

afaik, FC protocol facilitates interactions btwn ppl via blockchain, and enables other apps to tailor experiences with those interactions. E.g, Twitter like experience. The protocol itself, though, isn't treated as a product (w UX, flow, etc) beyond dev experience. Only the apps on top of it are. I think this is a gap

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

That's true for FC as well. E.g: Is the protocol a separate product with its own UX\product flow? The answer for FC is no. I.e, there are many apps that *leverage* the protocol, but no "protocol product". Eg for an app that does that is a marketplace of apps that use FC where user can switch between @dwr.eth makes sense?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

Thinking a lot lately about product & UX approaches to interoperability. Seems like there's a pretty big gap in *product* thought & literature on what is the value flow in interoperable applications. Am I imagining?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

My profile pic. It was taken in Canada 20 years ago with a shitty digital camera. No photoshop, no filters. Just beautiful serenity

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

Authenticating my Farcaster account on @perl. [0x77bd56cc6eb1e7ed362121202657e80007b4e97525f55d52c47769cfa5caf7006edf8ed57278567722debe3b460e11caed30065ba1478510369d29252cee00411c]

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

What feature\app on Farcaster encapsulates this relationship & its advantages?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

wow... Just shows how much the crypto & Web3.0 space needs product managers and marketers.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

What do u like to read? What do u like to learn?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

shanik pfp

Hello World! Who can see this if no one is following me 🤔

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction