Thinking a lot lately about product & UX approaches to interoperability. Seems like there's a pretty big gap in *product* thought & literature on what is the value flow in interoperable applications. Am I imagining?

That's true for FC as well. E.g:

Is the protocol a separate product with its own UX\product flow? The answer for FC is no. I.e, there are many apps that *leverage* the protocol, but no "protocol product". Eg for an app that does that is a marketplace of apps that use FC where user can switch between

@dwr.eth makes sense?