Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Barry pfp
Barry
@baz.eth
Hey all - just wanted to share some of my concerns about the public nature of our casts/behavior on FC. Hoping for an open dialogue on where we think this is headed, and in the long run, how to provide privacy protections from a user content perspective. https://paragraph.xyz/@barrycollier/farcaster-content-graph
17 replies
12 recasts
50 reactions

Semui pfp
Semui
@semui.eth
thanks for sharing, this is an interesting take. I take the view that everything is public in a sense, even on proprietary platforms given data breaches or how they may sell my data to third parties. With FarCaster being public by default, at least I don't have a false sense of security. I think awareness is key.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Barry pfp
Barry
@baz.eth
Thanks, Semui. I have a similar view on that, personally. I don't have any illusion of privacy online. I was just writing a similar thought as well For me, the concern is what happens with a (near) zero privacy protocol at scale if/when mainstream users adopt the network https://warpcast.com/baz.eth/0x39cf24ac
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Liam 🎩🔮⛓️💊 pfp
Liam 🎩🔮⛓️💊
@liamdarmody.eth
I like this take
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions