Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/lanparty
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
π benna ππ©
@benna
gm! π ICYMI, @benoit-tokyo and I published a text about βonchain artβ preservation for Lens Protocol. i think this may be one of the most important texts weβve written so far. you can read it here: https://app.t2.world/article/cm3cubfxx1313971ymc6nfncsnb
2 replies
1 recast
4 reactions
aestheticaβΏ
@aesthetica.eth
@sdv.eth has some thoughts...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
π benna ππ©
@benna
keen to hear them @sdv.eth if you have a moment !
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steve
@sdv.eth
I agree (and appreciate) the overall sentiment of the article! "Onchain" has an overstated promise of preserving both tx history and the artwork, neither of which is true for 99.9% of the NFTs we know today. But I would say it's still possible to store some artworks entirely within smart contracts. Autoglyphs was indeed the first but very far from the last to try this. They should be viewed as the prototype, not standard, for fully onchain art. I believe Avastars (2020) was amongst if not the first to get the metadata and artwork entirely onchain, using SVG. This concept was dormant until around mid 2021 when Cryptopunks deployed an updated contract that stored all of the pixel data to generate punks. I think this is what led the explosion of fully onchain art projects that followed. Some that come to mind: Loot, OnChain Monkeys, Terraforms, Shields, etc. There's also this infamous tweet from @dhof that concisely captures the range of being "onchain" https://x.com/dhof/status/1410060181849919489
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
π benna ππ©
@benna
Amazing, thank you so much for sharing your thoughts on this! I've seen this chat a couple times now (actually saw it the first time over a year ago, but didn't understand it at that time). I still need to look into SSTORE.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
