Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/thomas
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
As a non-American, I don’t quite get the fascination for filibustering. Yes, some guy (doesn’t matter which side of the aisle he’s from — this cast is apolitical) stood talking for 25 hours and five minutes. Yes, he beat the previous record by 47 minutes. No, he did not go to the bathroom, nor did he eat nor drink. The media are celebrating this as a “physical and mental feat that required stamina and willpower”, as if this was the Olympics. Except that it’s not a sport, it’s just a performative stunt that further trivializes politics and turns them into a farce, at a time when we need adults in the room more than ever. No wonder the electorate feels disconnected and numb.
20 replies
5 recasts
36 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
It’s usually done — Or threatened— as a tactic to prevent a bill from coming to a vote (prevent a cloture vote specifically). If you hold the floor, the vote can’t be called & it can be a last minute persuasion device as well. Sen Booker’s was more of a peaceful protest so not the usual filibuster.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
scottrepreneur
@scottrepreneur.eth
Also noteworthy, "the guy holding the record before me, held it for keeping folks like me from voting" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond_filibuster_of_the_Civil_Rights_Act_of_1957
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
Yeah Strom was a piece of work — he was still in the Senate when I was there — but being wheeled around by his staff. The southern Senators did it again before the Civil Rights Act of 1964 too.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
