Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Discussed with Mike, the problem is some spammy users triggering the bot to mention other users. I like mike's suggestions of letting bots opt in to a tag, we'll do that soon. But in the mean time: 1. If your bot is replying to the person that invoked it, that's fine. 2. If your bot is replying to or mentioning people that did not invoke it, that's less fine. Especially if a user can trigger your bot to mention another user
13 replies
26 recasts
100 reactions

sartocrates🃏 pfp
sartocrates🃏
@sartocrates
do ppl actually relaly care this much about a little superflous tagging and or “unwanted” replies etc…. where is the data on this? why is it such a big deal? is that actually representative of most users? or is it just catering to a small subset of users that are apparently super high maintenance and cant handle posting into a PUBLIC FORUM and getting interactions that they dont “like”? like is that really what all of this is all about? do most actual ppl using this app alot even really care much at all? esp. when they have block and muting abilities? what gives?
7 replies
4 recasts
34 reactions

Jacque(she|her).⌐◨-◨ pfp
Jacque(she|her).⌐◨-◨
@jacque
They asked for it programming their frames to push out hihi “@ name tags” and then getting mad when real questions need to be answered.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

sartocrates🃏 pfp
sartocrates🃏
@sartocrates
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jacque(she|her).⌐◨-◨ pfp
Jacque(she|her).⌐◨-◨
@jacque
It’s their own bed they made
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

sartocrates🃏 pfp
sartocrates🃏
@sartocrates
many many such cases. bingo.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jacque(she|her).⌐◨-◨ pfp
Jacque(she|her).⌐◨-◨
@jacque
Somehow this works.
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction