Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
christin
@christin
i took a break from fc today to charge my content generation battery 🔋 obsess-a-thon will start in about 90 min where i will cast about what i'm obsessed with nonstop until our stream about obsession tonight 👹
20 replies
1 recast
32 reactions
samvox
@samvox
Christin, is that possible that we are going to get spam label beacuse of engaging with someone who doesn't pay attention to our replays?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
christin
@christin
I want to summon @pichi who understands these algos better 🙏 I recommend you attend her weekly tavern to learn more about how the system works!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
We have a working theory that there is a magic number and if a certain number of replies get no interaction (aka no like, recast, or reply) you do trigger some sort of algo. No idea what the ratio is. Just my best guess since we know about 31,000 accounts have spam labels thanks to @mvr tracking it. @rjs may know if there is an existing Dune query that tracks your number of replies with zero interaction. Could be cool to look for patterns.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
christin
@christin
agree, in fact i might have tripped up this number myself on thursday when i was doing a lot more top casts than i usually do (as a stunt for the /okbanger show) 😅 to me, it seems important to craft a *few* good casts /replies that will lead to high engagement, than to have a large number of casts. however i also understand the new user dilemma where you don't know which casts will engage and the odds are low if you don't cast enough... 😭
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
samvox
@samvox
I've noticed that higher number of casts, lead to less entanglement. This is what I do. And the type of cast is important too The important issue is when we follow all these rules why are we still hidden . Isn't it attractive enough? Has Warpcast restrict us for a while? Can we understand the reason we are restricted ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
