𝓵𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓵𝓮𝓼𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓶𝓶𝓮𝓻 • building @buoy 🛟 • @dawnpatrol • pfista.com

I was actually disappointed in the wired 5 levels explainer on zero knowledge proofs – they failed to succinctly bridge over to a raw mathematical example, which I would have hoped for in the highest level, but instead just talked about use cases. I suspect it was Wired's fault rather than Amit, he's brilliant.

We need a Cassie channel to collect such casts of 

„why do they simplify it so much. Isn’t it obvious“

What I admire about Cassie the most is how deep the knowledge and intuitive understanding really goes

Feels like a walking super computer

Developer 🤓 build, develop and operate Farcaster solutions @ dtech.vision also love tech, decentralization, fitness and oldschool rap 😎

// vibe architect \\

host of vibe check podcast 
▶️ https://pods.media/vibe-check
❄️ icebreaker.xyz/dawufi
👀 seemore.tv/free/fc/dawufi

Lol reminding me of Cassie casts about finding / not finding specific flavors and brands of energy drinks at Farcon

smells like a walking bang energy

i kid

but you're 100% right

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

Building up the little fragments of intuition people need to cross the chasm of understanding something that looks so unintuitive on the surface is the _one_ thing I'd hope for out of an expert discussion on how it works.

I mean that they went into examples instead of the raw math I would expect from two experts discussing what they are and how they work. They briefly talk about randomness and extracting utility out of it (i.e. Random Oracle Model), but didn't hit the points I'd hope for in really explaining it to an audience.