Farcaster

Farcaster Devs

If we were to work on channels as a developer lego, what should we improve?

Decentralizing existing primitive doesn’t drive network growth. 

So would have to offer something new / compelling.

since apparently the "build another client, not a priority rn, doesn't drive long term growth, etc" is the default response here

(despite the general sense that channels are a rushed, underexplored feature (potential new primitive) where the lack of prioritization and thoughtfulness has led to increased friction and a worse NUX)

is anyone building a channel-focused client? 

i'm incredibly excited about the promise of channels and promise to dedicate a portion of my time, energy, and resources to exploring this with you and supporting you

i am a force of nature, as some of you may know, especially when i'm motivated by both the mission and someone telling me i'm wrong

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

as stated by many devs in replies all over the network without

 ability to create channels that users on warpcast can interact with and see

there is no faith from Devs to take that effort. Building a channel focused client or any client is way more then just building the tech as a demo

cozycast is proof of that. people wanted mute, but to enable just mute you need to build a very very good app. not just that one feature.

Developer 🤓 build, develop and operate Farcaster solutions @ dtech.vision also love tech, decentralization, fitness and oldschool rap 😎

no.

the assumption right now is "no one does it, so not worth changing anything"

while the question of "can we remove friction here to get to that intended outcome by making it easier for people to accomplish"

is way underexplored.

I'd love to see more of the latter instead of hammering heads on absolutes

so what you're saying is that no one is going to build a channel-focused client and i'm SOL (shit outta luck)?