Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Samuel pfp
Samuel
@samuellhuber.eth
Has anyone tried running `yarn identity create` on the Hub docker image? I am getting the attached error. I'd love for it to create the identity, then i'll start the hub. If I run the dockerfile directly the identity is missing.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Samuel pfp
Samuel
@samuellhuber.eth
Has any of you tried running Hubs on Kuberentes? or y'all on ECS? @manan @sds @sanjay Github: HEAVY WIP Code (link will be gone once merged) https://github.com/dtechvision/onchain-helmcharts/blob/leewardbound-patch-1/farcaster/hubs/values-example.yaml
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Samuel pfp
Samuel
@samuellhuber.eth
In case it helps, in the container everything is empy besides /home/node/app and there yarn install fails cc @leewardbound thanks for the idea to try building in the docker itself again (I assumed Dockerfile already copies that)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Shane da Silva pfp
Shane da Silva
@sds
We currently run hubs on AWS Fargate (ECS). We are going to migrate to running on EC2 instances soon. Primary reasons (high level): - Hubs in general have a "pet" instead of a "cattle"-like design in that the gossip protocol requires the node to have a reasonable static/stable IP. I'd love for us to move more towards cattle, but it's not a priority. - Fargate doesn't support static/stable IPs unless you use an NLB, and AWS' NLBs cause issues (CC @cassie) - ECS as a platform doesn't give you as much access to what happening on the underlying instance (understandably) - Where you serve read/writes for hub storage has a significant impact on performance, so making use of attached storage (e.g. instance store volumes) Since the hub can always re-sync with the network if you lose the node, loss of data during instance failure is fine for our use case.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions