Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
Every company, founder and hobby dev has one single question. What’s the total addressable market? In regards to Farcaster we proxy by DAU, but maybe that’s wrong? What if we focus on market size and sections? The question to be answered is for the above group of people is: If I get this right, will there be something at the end of the rainbow? Will I be able to monetize? Farcaster has a unique ability via direct wallets attached, to excel here and attract top top companies, founders and hobby devs. Still we don’t excel at communicating and focusing on it. Currently the playbook seems to be focused on user compensation aka answering that question for consumers. I hope that keeps the platform social and not a pure financial attention grab combined with crypto shills. Why does that user compensation matter?? Because as we measure in DAU it drives it up. But are there other ways? Are they being explored? How can they work? Fun questions to ponder
1 reply
1 recast
34 reactions
yerbearserker.base.eth 🧉🎯
@yerbearserker
The TAM question is critical for Empire Builder /glanker. Rather than just focusing on Farcaster DAU, we're targeting: 1. Token creators lacking technical expertise 2. Communities seeking sustainable engagement 3. Projects needing ready-made infrastructure Our $BAMBINO /bambino case study shows this working - bringing Sweden's largest newspaper's audience into web3 through their trusted podcast. @t0p0s.eth @tone4ever 🫡 Farcaster's wallet integration is our killer feature - it converts social engagement to economic activity without friction. We're looking beyond DAU to treasury volume, rewards distributed, & empire sustainability as better value indicators. The opportunity isn't just serving existing crypto users, but making tokens viable for communities that never considered them before. What if the real TAM includes all the creators currently excluded by technical barriers?
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions