Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Sam
@sams
Let's revive $nouns! We want to leverage $nouns to bring our @esports audience onchain while maintaining long term economic alignment with Nouns ⌐◨-◨ https://www.nouns.camp/candidates/scaling-nouns-with-%24nouns-68a2ad5b63ab374fc5f6f7d1fb5f41b267035868
7 replies
13 recasts
40 reactions
ns
@nickysap
As someone who initially tried to acquire my noun through $nouns I relate to the pain of egregiously low liquidity. I’m having trouble connecting the esports community and this though. Why does one beget the other? I don’t think shallow liquidity is the only thing holding $nouns back, so I would like to know how nouns esports will drive increased demand. You mention the platform enables a variety of onchain features. How popular are those features? What does demand look like for more opportunities? Just need to understand how meaningful this impact might be.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
SQX
@sqx
I agree. the $nouns token is flawed beyond the simple LP. (which was and is a BIG issue) main issue is it is used as rewards . and in so creates down only sell pressure. Thicker LP may fix this, but only if dynamic and concentrated to localize around current price. nouns in pool unusable but attributed to threshold is another big issue. lowering threshold to compensate only opens potential attack vectors IMO. lastly. nouns has generally rinsed the public over and over. we have a optics and pr issue as far as coins and tokens go IMO.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Sam
@sams
Not just being used as rewards. Also agree on the quorum stuff we need a better long term solution but there’s no reason we can just implement excluding $nouns from the quorum calculation in the future or some other mechanism to fix it https://warpcast.com/sams/0xe28cd9c0
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
