Ryan
@ryanfmason
The framing of this article is at least unhelpful, at worst deceptive. The main point of the article is there are macro conditions separate from who wins the election (fair), but not that Harris and Trump have equally favorable/unfavorable crypto policy, which is the implication. Trump’s rhetoric on policy is that he’s highly favorable on crypto. Biden/Harris admin’s actions are extremely clear that they are unfavorable to it.
4 replies
23 recasts
24 reactions
Ryan
@ryanfmason
Also kind of pedantic but would be worth making a distinction between flows to BTC vs what is overall good for the crypto industry
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan
@ryanfmason
FWIW I think Laura Shin is a good reporter and I’ve followed her work since 2017, I’m just very skeptical of what seems like a creeping desire to rehabilitate the top Dems clear opposition to and active participation in killing the crypto industry
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Laura Shin
@laurashin
The article makes it clear it’s talking about macro conditions and not about the policy positions of the candidates.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Victor
@victoreram
Whoever wins the election can strongly influence the macro conditions using policy. Can't decouple the two for the sake of argument
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
