Should we rebrand Warpcast to Farcaster?

We separated Warpcast (the app) from Farcaster (the protocol) a few years ago. 

We've heard from many new users that this is very, very confusing. People hear about Farcaster, search in the app store, can't find anything called Farcaster and then churn.

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

Assuming there's a desire to maintain a standalone protocol, is there an opportunity to rebrand that to some other third thing?

Warpcast -> Farcaster
Farcaster -> The Cast Protocol

Tbh I’m not attached to farcaster as the name for the protocol, I just think it is actually important for the client to have a different name from the protocol

I like the idea @runninyeti.eth suggested here. If the client becomes Farcaster maybe there’s an opportunity to rename the protocol for the sake of preserving this distinction

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

Tbh I’m not attached to farcaster as the name for the protocol, I just think it is actually important for the client to have a different name from the protocol

I like the idea @runninyeti.eth suggested here. If the client becomes Farcaster maybe there’s an opportunity to rename the protocol for the sake of preserving this distinction

https://warpcast.com/runninyeti.eth/0x2f31eb1d

Yes! There's a short term win for user growth by cannibalizing the "Farcaster" brand

But there are many long term wins for keeping the protocol separate (and branding matters way less there; for now)