Among the largest purple app accounts (ones with at least 3k followers).. here are the 100 most influential accounts (based on eigenvector centrality algorithm)

Among the largest purple app accounts (ones with at least 3k followers).. here are the 100 most influential accounts (based on eigenvector centrality algorithm) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15Ndxoalc_Jjr7GX2h7weK-Z59K90JtcxmIiw67q1kR4

This is really interesting. I've been working on my own Farcaster influence ranking algorithm (Farcaster Cred Score).

While structurally similar, FCS focuses specifically on an "acknowledged value" subgraph - measuring incoming relationships that recognize value from reputable sources.

There's significant overlap between our lists, especially for the top 25 or so accounts, i.e. @ted is #3 on FCS and #6 on the your list.

After that, the results diverge a bit, with FCS highlighting accounts with perhaps less nominal centrality but highly efficient/impactful reach. 

Did a VLOOKUP on your list for ease of comparison.

helping build farcaster | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina | “lucky me, lucky mud”

I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

This is really interesting. I've been working on my own Farcaster influence ranking algorithm (Farcaster Cred Score).

While structurally similar, FCS focuses specifically on an "acknowledged value" subgraph - measuring incoming relationships that recognize value from reputable sources.

There's significant overlap between our lists, especially for the top 25 or so accounts, i.e. @ted is #3 on FCS and #6 on the your list.

After that, the results diverge a bit, with FCS highlighting accounts with perhaps less nominal centrality but highly efficient/impactful reach. 

Did a VLOOKUP on your list for ease of comparison.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18hnGyiWriOX7-MOhJyzN_uT3xQnh4Hhbfv2yLlPI9NM/edit?usp=sharing