Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
I want to talk to ChatGPT about books—granularly reference, make outlines, debate core points, expand on topics, etc. I would easily pay $20 per book to do this. Why can't OpenAI facilitate that txn, and why wouldn't authors be open to it? The alternative (pirating) feels like limewire before iTunes came around.
9 replies
5 recasts
24 reactions

JB Rubinovitz pfp
JB Rubinovitz
@rubinovitz
I don't think publishers will ever trust ai companies with their books after all the copyright infringement. May be an interesting use case for crypto x ai but I dont think the market is big enough for the trouble.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
I agree that there's a level of trust that needs to be built and hasn't until now. But the same was true for music, and that didn't stop Steve Jobs. Separately, how does crypto fit into it?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

JB Rubinovitz pfp
JB Rubinovitz
@rubinovitz
you could provably enforce data rights with crypto.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
So I can prove that I interacted with the Kindle contract to buy a specific book, and that gives me access to the file?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

JB Rubinovitz pfp
JB Rubinovitz
@rubinovitz
On the model pipeline level I'd imagine provably training a model on book data without actually giving anyone else access to that data. And then you could provably pay the publisher whenever that model is used.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
Well presumably they'd need to "give" OAI the transcripts just as record labels had to give MP3s to Apple so they could sell them. But really the helpful part is importing the book text into the LLM's context and generating embeddings, and maybe some quick start prompts.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

JB Rubinovitz pfp
JB Rubinovitz
@rubinovitz
you dont need to give people your data to allow them to train models on it. there are privacy preserving techniques. they just dont have PMF.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
Ahh I see what you mean. You're right above IMO, going to be hard to convince publishers to go along with it. But it would be so cool if they do.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction