jihad ↑
@jihad
We claim to have “attention markets” today, but do we really? This would imply that price of a proxy asset is directly correlated with aggregate attention on a meme/idea/information. Or at least that volume is correlated. Trump is no less relevant now than he was when his coin dropped — is the token accurately capturing attention? The nature of tokens is such that you need *consistent value creation* to sustain the relationship between attention and price, and we don’t currently see that with tokens today.
8 replies
2 recasts
23 reactions
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
We have casino schelling points: People learn that once a certain series of events occur a casino game begins. But as more people learn the rules there’s less and less alpha.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction