Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
supriyo
@supriyo.eth
A few observations (personal and take it with a grain of salt) from Nouns Movie EP3 mint and couple of others : - Driving mint is very hard. Compounded by low attention on nft primary dynamics overall. - Unless actively / canonically pushed and supported by majority of the community members , mints aren't making a meaningful impact or dent as substitute of revenue with nouns context. - e.g. Nouns movie ep3 mint, shark pickle cone ep mint, artist program mints, nounish art mints etc all have had low to extremely low volume on primary f(r)ee mints. - 4484 mint was very successful because of push across the board top-down across all L2 socials and channels. Broad questions i don't have answers to - - If crypto-native earnings within nounish media context needs to be a thing, what else can be done to make this a reality within the abundance of media created atm . - Nounish media is subsidized by treasury funding but isn't self-sufficient by any means. If treasury isn't there, does the flywheel stop?
5 replies
1 recast
12 reactions
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
Re 4484 mint I wonder if this means we should do more collabs with IP and KOL with distribution?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
supriyo
@supriyo.eth
good question. In a loosely held opinion - yes, i think from 4484, the signal definitely was that a mint that was broadly ethereum aligned that happened to be sponsored by Nouns was relatable to nouns adjacent communities vs only nouns hardcore fans. Social amplification across the board helped quite a bit there as well. Although - if we need “another” IP for mints to be discoverable then we have bigger issues to solve for. All in all, i do feel we need a strict deep dive into what our true onchain fandom looks like vs perceived fandom (mistaken from surface level vanity metrics e.g channel followers) Because we are suboptimal atm at even targeting inward , forget outward.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
