coins

another way of thinking about coins on @zora is it's just a fractionalized 1/1. likely *easier* for people to understand than open editions.

something about @ripe's work really landed this for me.

another way of thinking about coins on @zora is it's just a fractionalized 1/1. likely *easier* for people to understand than open editions.

something about @ripe's work really landed this for me.
 
https://zora.co/coin/base:0x5a34646b860485f012435e2486edb375615d1c7b?referrer=0x7752bb9add2aa5afe56450f5f02648ff0335a51c

Content coins seem directionally correct for the technology but the UX isn’t for normal people yet.

Fine for memecoin folks, but I think for everyone else “fractionalization” and “owning a piece of X” is more understandable and palatable than making the UX super financialized with swaps and buys.

Let me opt in to owning a percentage of the thing, don’t make me think about owning X $madeuptoken

Multiplying onchain economies. Working on interfaces /comint and intelligence @tenfold
Past: AI and crypto rubinovitz.com

Every time I've talked about "fractionalizing" something with normal people, they've wondered what that means and why they should care.

On the other hand, "owning a piece of X" is definitely more understandable and palatable - but if you own the thing, it only makes sense to see the history of who else has owned that same thing and when

In a non-crypto context: yes, I love owning a pair of Jordan 1s, *and* I also love seeing who else owns and wears Jordan 1s *and* when they got them. 

Owning the shoe is one thing, but knowing who else owns them, how many pairs, when they bought them, etc tells me more

Curious how "fractionalization" will do vs "own a piece of"

If Coinbase looks into this please let us know

https://warpcast.com/rubinovitz/0x0e9480d3
https://warpcast.com/zd/0x8d80d682
.

@base builder #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3