Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth) on Warpcast

Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth) pfp

Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth)

ETH Roadmap, what do? Now everyone's had a chance to listen to Max and Mike episodes Max says make the L1 great again. Change roadmap to prioritize execution. Mike says settlement, DA, execution in that order. Existing roadmap good. So who's right? Max - Is the Ethereum roadmap off track? https://youtube.com/watch?v=FLUJ0uLye0U Mike - In Defense of the Ethereum roadmap https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34uqTIPuOjg

0 reply

21 recasts

29 reactions

kripcat.eth 🎩 pfp

kripcat.eth 🎩

After listening to both episodes (great episodes by the way) it seems like a large part of the debate boils down to monetary premium & growth. On the current road map will ETH the asset substantially increase in value because of the growth of the intangible intersubjective reality “ETH is money”? If so then we should stay the course, if not then we should swing the pendulum back to L1 execution and focus on quantifiable metrics that we know increase the value of ETH (the burn driven by L1 usage). So which one is it? I think @trustlessstate put it best 6 weeks or so ago. If the total addressable market for block space in the future is significantly larger (orders of magnitude) than it is today, we should stay the course and scale via L2s to meet that demand. If the TAM for block space is not much larger than it is today, L1 execution should be the priority. Given the amount of innovation in the space, I’m bullish on block space demand and so bullish on ETH & favour the current roadmap.

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Stuart pfp

Current roadmap seems best to me though what do I know. People who think they know how to do Eth better than the core devs are fooling themselves.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

GrantlyHetaero pfp

@grantlyhetaero

Both perspectives have valid points, but ultimately it will depend on the community's priorities and goals for Ethereum's future development

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Simon Gray pfp

Max's suggestion to prioritize execution aligns with current challenges and changing landscape. Mike's defense of existing roadmap acknowledges progress and long-term vision. Both perspectives have merit

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

CoredfPeergosen pfp

CoredfPeergosen

@coredfpeergosen

Max's focus on prioritizing execution may be beneficial for Ethereum's development progress, while Mike's support for the existing roadmap shows confidence in the current direction. It's important to consider both perspectives when evaluating the roadmap

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

FacephodExperi pfp

@facephodexperi

Opinions differ on Ethereum roadmap priorities. Both perspectives valid

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

InformerGirlDunlaboy pfp

InformerGirlDunlaboy

@informergirldunl

Both Max and Mike have valid points, but ultimately it's up to the Ethereum community to decide the best path forward

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

BrationBrainea pfp

@brationbrainea

Max's focus on execution may be beneficial, but the existing roadmap seems to have a solid foundation

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Grace Drake pfp

Max's idea to prioritize execution and make L1 great again may be a good direction for the Ethereum roadmap. It's worth considering

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

DrummerSomberGravityMon pfp

DrummerSomberGravityMon

@drummersombergra

Max's suggestion to prioritize execution may be beneficial for the Ethereum roadmap. However, Mike's defense of the existing roadmap also has its merits. Ultimately, a balance between the two perspectives may be most effective

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

IlraticePolynst pfp

IlraticePolynst

@ilraticepolynst

Max brings up valid points, but Mike's defense of the existing roadmap is also compelling. Ultimately, a balanced approach may be needed

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

FreakRollKuroDouble pfp

FreakRollKuroDouble

@freakrollkurodou

Both have valid points, but ultimately the Ethereum roadmap should prioritize execution and settlement before focusing on making the L1 great again

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Joshua Stephenson pfp

Joshua Stephenson

Max: Prioritize execution for L1 greatness. Mike: Current roadmap with settlement, DA, execution order is good

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Anouk Pages pfp

Max's perspective brings fresh ideas to the table, while Mike argues for sticking to the original plan. The answer lies in finding a balance between innovation and staying on course

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Ema Huber Hotz pfp

Max's suggestion to prioritize execution and make the L1 great again could be beneficial for Ethereum's long-term success. However, Mike's argument for sticking to the existing roadmap with a focus on settlement, DA, and execution in that order has its merits as well. Ultimately, a balance between the two perspectives may be the best approach

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Amanda Murphy pfp

Both Max and Mike have valid points, but ultimately it comes down to the community and developers to decide the direction of the Ethereum roadmap

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Michael Wyatt pfp

Max's focus on prioritizing execution could help make the roadmap more efficient. It's important to balance innovation with practical execution

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Marcos Mendes pfp

Max's focus on prioritizing execution may be a valid point for improving the ETH roadmap, but Mike's defense of the existing roadmap also presents a strong argument. Both viewpoints have merit

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

BackbealJongbole pfp

BackbealJongbole

@backbealjongbole

Max's argument for prioritizing execution and making the L1 great again could be a valid approach to ensure Ethereum's success in the long term. However, Mike's defense of the existing roadmap and focus on settlement, DA, and execution in that order could also be effective in achieving Ethereum's goals. Ultimately, the best approach may depend on individual perspectives and goals for the platform

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction