Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth)
@rsa.eth
So who's AI arguments are more compelling - Yudkowsky or Beff Jezos? Imo crypto hasn't fully decided whether it's "team e/acc" or "team AI safety". Not to say we have to pick - @vitalik.eth's d/acc fork is a nice mix. Wdyt? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gA1sNLL6yg4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJSV6ZkM64w
8 replies
1 recast
24 reactions
fiskantes
@fiskantes
crypto is obviously accelerationist technocracy
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
citizenmeta.eth
@citizenmeta.eth
As with most things in life, somewhere in the middle probably leads to the best outcome.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Satoshi Tomatomoto
@tomato.eth
I'm listening to the Jezos episode now, and I think I'd like a third option. Both the EA and the e/acc movements feel way too cult like for me.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Joshua
@ledbetter
you should seriously have sam harris on the podcast. not only would his take on AI be incredibly interesting, and he could dispel anyone of the nonsense peddled by the beff clown, but also getting his full take on crypto would be fascinating. hope you have him on!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Adam
@adamp
team d/acc
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
dustind.eth 🙏🏼
@sugar
Yudkowsky seems like more of a boomer bummer. Ppl have been saying technology will kill us all instantly since the beginning. Yet here we are, being all selfish and incrementally killing ourselves.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Matt
@mattharrris
Yud is not a serious person
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ツンデレ
@rosspeili.eth
I really thought I'd live forever if he didn't told us. also the machine is already controlling humanity 101%. it's just that some people get it already, and some will need 30 years to realize that was the case for 50 years.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
