Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
enuff of the fluffs, to truly allow users "own" their data we need: 1. store data on their own server or locally on their device 2. store data on a public ledger/storage network with guaranteed data availability, and .. encrypted This is very different from owning assets where it is sufficient to just own the key
4 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
sean 🔹
@swabbie.eth
zk tech will do that. also possible with encrypted data stored in distributed systems and shared by request. no serious mass market product will require storage of large quantities of data locally.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
Yes and "no serious mass market product" my android storage stats say otherwise tho. You could easily find apps with >1 GB storage. Encrypted data in distributed system is another route. It is just tricky to make sure the data is available without relying on chains like arweave or filecoin
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sean 🔹
@swabbie.eth
why not encrypted data on arweave unencrypted for use on the signer’s authority? people don’t want to be device-bound
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
local first for UX and data backup + remote decentralised storage network for cross device sync and long term archive
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Royal
@royalaid.eth
The problem is convenience to the user, it has to meet or beat Dropbox. Tech adoption and crypto's stagnation while AI flies high kind of proves this, the only reason crypto seems to have the penetration that it does is because of the profit incentives to join and system of make due with the current UX
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
For most ppl AI is much more useful than Web3 right now. Simple fact.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
This is the most difficult part. Even reach feature parity to web2 app is a big ask let alone UX and DX.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction