Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
🗿
@bias
here’s how we settle the Ai outputs debate once and for all: if I tell you to paint a picture of a dog and then you do, did I create art?
16 replies
0 recast
33 reactions
Royal
@royalaid.eth
I think people just want to measure the amount of effort put in. If there isn't a ton of effort they discount it as slop. If someone spends a ton of time in an AI editor exclusively prompting and refining and then refining sections but only using AI tools did they make art? If took them 5 mins of this loop? If it took them 5 hours? 50 hours?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
🗿
@bias
so if you show me the picture of the dog you painted, and then I tell you over the course of hours, everytime you come back to me, to refine certain areas of the painting you made of the dog: then its my art?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Royal
@royalaid.eth
Is the computer entitled to this kind of agency? Does photoshopping something and then printing mean I didn't create art? Is a work printed by a computer the work of the printer? Is a photo run through the modern photography stack on iOS or Android the original photographers photo? Is the intro to Secret Invasion art? I still feel it boils down to intent and effort, just because its a new medium doesn't make it not art.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
🗿
@bias
Photoshop is a tool, it doesn't have its own agency (discounting the AI tools they're putting into it nowadays), typically what comes out of photoshop is a 1:1 of the work the user put into the tool. A 1:1 of input output is direct manipulation of the work by said artist/user. There is no middle man/agency in between the artist and the output with tools.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
