Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ryan J. Shaw pfp
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
Triggered. So I built a dashboard. Search for your fname like this e.g.: @rjs@ My ego rank: 12,405 (a lot of those higher than this are bots, if we had a reliable way to filter them out I'd be right up top there) Ted score (ego size): 4.405 Teds out of a max of 6.624 Quote %: 46.88% 😄 Standard Deviations: 1.004 Quote Percentile: 85.25% (this percentage of people quote cast less than I do) https://dune.com/ryanjshaw/farcaster-ego-dashboard
7 replies
2 recasts
12 reactions

Ryan J. Shaw pfp
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
@wake.eth you're the highest ranking human I've found so far 🍻
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wake pfp
wake
@wake.eth
could use an ELI5. the idea is "arrogant people quotecast more often" and "humble people reply more often"?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Ryan J. Shaw pfp
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
Yup that's how I understood it I quantified it by comparing each person's quote vs. original cast ratio. Then ranked everyone. You and I evidently have huge egos because 92% of people quote cast less than you, and 85% quote cast less than I do. (I actually didn't look at replies at all because I think that's too heavily skewed algorithmically.)
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

mvr 🐹 pfp
mvr 🐹
@mvr
Or you both are the kindest wholeheartedly persons sharing that 10x Moxie reward. Reply is only 5x
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

wake pfp
wake
@wake.eth
I mean, you're not wrong about the ego... Curious how that holds up against my cast totals compared to others. Relative to how much I cast, I QC less than I reply, especially lately.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
actual methodology would be # of quote casts vs # of replies, disregard original casts completely
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction