Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ryan J. Shaw β“‚οΈπŸŽ© pfp
Ryan J. Shaw β“‚οΈπŸŽ©
@rjs
AFAICT, @openrank doesn't treat root casts & replies differently. They use the Farcaster replicator (obsoleted 5 hours ago). Here's the query they use to compute local trust values: no distinction between root vs child casts https://github.com/Karma3Labs/farcaster-graph/blob/main/pipeline/globaltrust/queries.py#L7-L8
0 reply
3 recasts
30 reactions

Rundle πŸ– pfp
Rundle πŸ–
@rundle
Is this replies on how own root casts, or replies on other casts in general?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Ryan J. Shaw β“‚οΈπŸŽ© pfp
Ryan J. Shaw β“‚οΈπŸŽ©
@rjs
Excellent question 1000 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rundle πŸ– pfp
Rundle πŸ–
@rundle
Woah thanks!! Love this work you're doing unpacking it all πŸ™
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ryan J. Shaw β“‚οΈπŸŽ© pfp
Ryan J. Shaw β“‚οΈπŸŽ©
@rjs
You might have discovered a vulnerability in the implementation, but the code is hard to follow without it running locally, so it's possible I just missed a filter... let's see what the @openrank peeps say
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rundle πŸ– pfp
Rundle πŸ–
@rundle
It's all from your work! Will be interesting to see what comes of this as I've been wondering the weighting of replies to original casts in the new system Will keep my eyes peeled!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction