Michael Pfister
@pfista
Say you’re a new VP at a startup. Agree or disagree? https://twitter.com/atthatmatt/status/1586845835005808640?s=46&t=12_-YCMX7bHDTDJ-vouPHQ
12 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Rio Akasaka
@rio
Somewhat disagree. I have so much more respect for a leader who understands that change is not a necessary ingredient for impact. I would rather a VP who says “I’m forming / have opinions but I’m here to learn what has worked and what hasn’t worked in the recent past”
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Les Greys
@les
Wouldn’t the fact, a VP comes in and does this, if not done previously, make it a non-critical change? If done previously, I doubt the VP would have left or been replaced. If it had, the mere face-value of pulling you into meetings with a different name on the calendar makes it a non-crit change.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Michael Pfister
@pfista
Yeah I really appreciate your sentiment and would hope most people see it that way. Making a decision purely for political motives or signaling seems yucky. On the other hand, quick, good faith decision making is super important. https://twitter.com/austen/status/1586830390953594880?s=46&t=sIXpW3zxDfYfgmOzWC4Wmw
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
