rileybeans
@rileybeans
I aggressively agree with this. Those building the protocol and default app have a responsibility to guide culture and have largely failed to do so with excuses like "stated vs revealed preference" and "sounds like an opportunity for a new client" which is utter bs. Do better.
4 replies
3 recasts
35 reactions
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
Same question then...what would you do? https://warpcast.com/horsefacts.eth/0x69c6d4b8
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
rileybeans
@rileybeans
1. not refuse any (good, non-growth hacky) marketing efforts 2. discourage the place turning into a casino (it's not that bad but has the potential) 3. there has been some attempt at listening to users complaints but not enough or listening to the wrong users 4. less focus on only hiring devs at this point (at least devs who don't also understand culture 5. it's a social protocol, find ways to use it that heavily encourage more connection, we humans need it from a better social app 6. heavily de-rank clear use of botting - we all know why they're doing it 7. stop being oblivious to the obvious by being blinded by the tech 8. incentivise higher quality creators by giving them resources they need to grow from the start because new people spend weeks casting into a void and churn these may not be perfect or what the team wants to hear but I'm here every day still because I made friends here.
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
thank you! đź’– > stop being oblivious to the obvious by being blinded by the tech what does this mean?
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
rileybeans
@rileybeans
I think what I mean to say is that the weight of teams like base and the like put pressure on insentivising builders when, as Dan has alluded to recently, the focus of all with funding should now shift to creators
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
