Farcaster

came across an old speech by Cory Doctorow from his blogpost today (link in comment). the speech is about AOL bots, which got me thinking: there is a subtle but meaningful difference between the two perspectives: 

1. spambots take away from Farcaster
2. a reasonable >0 number of spambots is the cost of having a Farcaster (for intended human use)

both are true; one from the angle of loss; the other, cost. one might find a slight empowerment in thinking one is receiving something in return for an irksome sacrifice.

(i would prefer only up to a reasonable >0 number of spambots in the comments section pls)

came across an old speech by Cory Doctorow from his blogpost today (link in comment). the speech is about AOL bots, which got me thinking: there is a subtle but meaningful difference between the two perspectives: 

1. spambots take away from Farcaster
2. a reasonable >0 number of spambots is the cost of having a Farcaster (for intended human use)

both are true; one from the angle of loss; the other, cost. one might find a slight empowerment in thinking one is receiving something in return for an irksome sacrifice.

(i would prefer only up to a reasonable >0 number of spambots in the comments section pls)

https://craphound.com/complexecosystems.txt

janitor@ /middle-mgmt // inquiring in /inquiry // web3 law stuff // f̶r̶e̶e̶ ̶R̶o̶s̶s̶ // free Assange // ☮︎ Ξ ✧

lovelight.eth.limo

https://pluralistic.net/2025/04/24/hermit-kingdom/#simpler-times