Reid DeRamus pfp
Reid DeRamus
@reidtandy
A recurring question is whether speculation & other motivators can co-exist - in the same purchase, same product ux, etc. I think they can! One dumb example that came to mind: Phish posters, specifically Jim Pollock prints. Fans arrive early to shows to buy these prints & go through the annoying experience of being at a Phish show w/ a poster tube. Most people buying these prints do so out of fandom & show them off in their homes, offices, etc. BUT, some folks end up selling them, and there's a decent secondary market for these posters. https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=Jim%20Pollock%20Phish%20Poster IMO, financial gain is not a primary motivator for people buying these prints (there's much easier ways to make money!), but the opportunity for the price to appreciate may encourage more people to buy them and/or pay more for the prints, both of which grow revenue for these prints & expand the broader Phish economy.
3 replies
2 recasts
9 reactions

Reid DeRamus pfp
Reid DeRamus
@reidtandy
Most of these tend to be rooted in collectibles: first edition books, old band / tour t-shirts, MTG / Pokémon cards, certain vinyl records. I think this why I really like the idea of mixing in limited edition NFT's to a tiered approach to buying coins: - Supporter (buy a set amount of coins) - Superfan (buy more coins & get a 1 of 25 limited-edition NFT) - Patron Saint (buy even more coins (w/ option to buy more!) & get a 1 of 3 limited-edition NFT)
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions