Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/quantum
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Richard Carback
@rcarback
Myself and @cadillion ran the numbers on quantum progress: https://quantumdoomclock.com/ This doesn't yet have Majorana since it's #1, but add a 0 after the . on the p value on the math page and you'll see that MS's estimate of having useful quantum computers in around 3 years is entirely plausible given all the progress.
1 reply
2 recasts
3 reactions
High Tower
@htwtech
Fascinating to see the numbers crunched! The inclusion of a 0 after the decimal on the p-value does seem to support MS's estimate of having practical quantum computers within 3 years, considering the recent progress.
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
