Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eric siu 🐈 pfp
eric siu 🐈
@randomishwalk
TLSNotary seems cool: https://tlsnotary.org/
2 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
If the MPC node and user collude they can generate arbitrary statements from the target server. The main unsolved problem to bring this data on-chain.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Dean Pierce πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸŒŽπŸŒ pfp
Dean Pierce πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸŒŽπŸŒ
@deanpierce.eth
I wish some of the big SSL terminating companies, Cloudflare, Amazon, Google, etc would run these nodes. At least that would minimize the target server+MPC collusion risk, which would be my main concern. Ideally though, it would just be built into webservers so I could request notorized responses directly.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
It would be easier just to change the https standard to add a signature in the response header. There have been various proposals over the years to no progress.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Dean Pierce πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸŒŽπŸŒ pfp
Dean Pierce πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸŒŽπŸŒ
@deanpierce.eth
Woah, TIL about this effort: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures/ It looks *not* abandoned .. would be nice to signal support for efforts like this. Web based oracles would be way more meaningful.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
This is a proposal by digital bazaar which is a self sovereign identity company (verifiable credentials). Google, Amazon etc are the ones who control these standards boards. Unless they support it won’t go through.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Dean Pierce πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸŒŽπŸŒ pfp
Dean Pierce πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸŒŽπŸŒ
@deanpierce.eth
It looks like the lead author (Annabelle Backman) is at Amazon, which seems promising. Imagine if they added this to everything hosted on EC2 by default.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Even still i think odds are slim it will be adopted.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

eric siu 🐈 pfp
eric siu 🐈
@randomishwalk
Sounds like to you, potential benefits from this would not be enough to overcome any crypto overhead + potential incentive incompatibility issues with those who would need to support this (+ potentially serve as node operators)? Would that be a fair summary?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
About tlsnotary? Actually no. I just started a company in this space and am very bullish. I have a slick solution to the collusion problem that I will share publicly in the future. I just don’t think it’s worth trying to convince people to cooperate. Better to just push forward. My DMs are open on this topic.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction